← Fact-checks

Fact-check: BHP lawsuit against Michael West Media

Overall verdict Misleading

Michael West Media reports that BHP has filed a Federal Court application seeking to suppress journalism about a wage theft case involving former coal miner Simon Turner. The article outlines the specific legal orders BHP is seeking and argues this represents a press freedom issue, while contextualizing the case within broader industrial relations disputes.

On 8 May 2026, Michael West Media published an article reporting that BHP had filed a Federal Court application seeking to suppress journalism about a wage theft case involving former coal miner Simon Turner. The article provided specific details about the legal action, including the Federal Court case number, the date of filing, and the nature of the orders BHP was allegedly seeking. It framed the litigation as a significant press freedom issue and provided context about Turner's injury at BHP's Mt Arthur coal mine and subsequent wage dispute.

The article detailed BHP's purported demands to remove specific content from Michael West Media's platforms, including articles and videos published in April 2026. It also outlined the publication's extensive coverage of Turner's case and positioned the legal action within broader debates about corporate litigation against journalism in Australia.

This fact-check examines eight specific factual claims made in the article, ranging from verifiable court records and publication dates to wage allegations and injury details. The review assessed each claim against authoritative sources including Federal Court records, independent news reporting from whitelisted Australian media outlets, and publicly available corporate and regulatory information.

Background

Simon Turner's case has been the subject of significant reporting by Michael West Media since mid-2024, focusing on allegations of wage underpayment in the coal mining industry. The broader context involves documented issues with worker compensation in BHP's coal operations. Multiple authoritative sources, including ABC News, confirm that BHP admitted in 2023 to underpaying approximately 30,000 workers a total of $430 million for incorrect leave deductions spanning 2010 to 2023. Additionally, Fair Work Commission rulings in July 2025 ordered BHP to pay approximately 2,200 Queensland coal miners an average $30,000 more annually under Same Job Same Pay legislation.

The Mt Arthur coal mine, located in the Hunter Valley, is operated by Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BHP Group Limited. This corporate structure is relevant to understanding the parties named in Federal Court case NSD 752 of 2026, where both BHP Group Limited and its subsidiary entities appear as applicants against Simon Turner and the publisher of Michael West Media.

Claim 1: BHP has filed a Federal Court application with the case number NSD 752 of 2026, filed on 6 May 2026.

Verdict: True

The claim that BHP filed a Federal Court application with case number NSD 752 of 2026 on 6 May 2026 is directly corroborated by official Federal Court records. Evidence from the Federal Court of Australia's case management system at comcourts.gov.au shows that case NSD752/2026 was filed on 06-May-2026 with the parties listed as BHP GROUP LIMITED & ORS v SIMON ALEXANDER TURNER & ANOR. The court record also shows that a cross-claim was filed by Turner on 14-May-2026, and the case status is listed as open.

While the Michael West Media article describes the applicant as "Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd & Ors [BHP]" and the official court record lists "BHP GROUP LIMITED & ORS," this represents only a minor variation in how the corporate applicants are named rather than a factual error. Multiple authoritative sources, including BHP's own website, NSW government resources, and industry publications, confirm that Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BHP that operates the Mt Arthur Coal mine. The notation "& Ors" (and others) indicates multiple related corporate entities are applicants, which is consistent with both characterizations.

The core factual elements of the claim, the case number NSD 752 of 2026 and the filing date of 6 May 2026, are directly corroborated by the official Federal Court registry data. The primary source court record itself constitutes the highest tier of evidence for verifying the existence and details of a legal filing. No evidence was found contradicting these specific factual assertions.

Sources cited:

Claim 2: A conciliation conference was held by Microsoft Teams on 7 June 2024 with parties Tom Hunter-Leahy, Lachlan Apps, Sophie Croft, Simon Turner, Trent Forno, John Hickey, and Hugh Carter.

Verdict: Unsupported

The claim states that a conciliation conference was held by Microsoft Teams on 7 June 2024 with specific parties including Tom Hunter-Leahy, Lachlan Apps, Sophie Croft, Simon Turner, Trent Forno, John Hickey, and Hugh Carter. This claim originates from Michael West Media's own reporting about what BHP allegedly included in its Federal Court Originating Application in case NSD 752 of 2026.

Research confirms that the Federal Court case file NSD752/2026 does exist, filed on 6 May 2026, with parties listed as BHP Group Limited and others versus Simon Alexander Turner and another party. Microsoft Teams is confirmed through multiple sources as commonly used technology for conciliation conferences in Australian federal courts. Hugh Carter is confirmed through multiple sources as a barrister associated with Senator Malcolm Roberts and One Nation.

However, the specific factual claims about the June 7, 2024 conciliation conference, including its occurrence, the precise list of attendees, and its format, cannot be independently verified from authoritative whitelisted sources. The only sources referencing these details are Michael West Media articles themselves, which report on what they claim BHP stated in court filings. No independent media reporting from whitelisted outlets such as ABC, Guardian Australia, Australian Financial Review, or other major news organizations was found covering this specific conciliation conference or its attendees.

While the context around the claim appears plausible, the specific factual assertions about this particular conference on this particular date with these particular attendees cannot be corroborated from independent authoritative sources. The article's disclosure notes it is reporting from court files, but those court files are not directly accessible as independent verification for the purposes of this fact-check.

Sources cited:

Claim 3: A YouTube video was published on Michael West Media on April 15, 2026 titled 'Pauline, Please Explain | The West Report'.

Verdict: Misleading

The claim states that a YouTube video titled "Pauline, Please Explain | The West Report" was published on Michael West Media on April 15, 2026. According to BHP's court filing in Federal Court case NSD 752 of 2026, BHP did seek orders to remove a YouTube video with this exact title allegedly published on April 15, 2026. However, evidence from Michael West Media's own subsequent reporting indicates this claim contains a critical inaccuracy regarding the publication date and format.

In Michael West Media's article "BHP wanted us silenced NOW. The Federal Court said no" published on May 21, 2026, the publication states that BHP's original application filed on May 6, 2026 "was directed at our earlier coverage of these events, in particular the editorial we published on April 11, 2026 under the title Please Explain, Pauline, which we also released in print and in podcast form." This indicates the content titled "Please Explain, Pauline," note the different word order from the claim, was published on April 11, 2026, not April 15, 2026, and was released as an editorial in multiple formats including print and podcast, not specifically as a YouTube video on that date.

The confusion appears to stem from BHP's court documents, which reference a video titled "Pauline, Please Explain | The West Report" with an April 15, 2026 date. However, Michael West Media's own contemporaneous reporting clarifies the actual publication was an editorial titled "Please Explain, Pauline" on April 11, 2026. The discrepancy in dates, April 11 versus April 15, and the reversed title order, combined with Michael West Media describing it as an editorial released in multiple formats rather than a YouTube video specifically, indicates the claim as stated contains material inaccuracies that could mislead readers about when and how this content was published.

Claim 4: An article was published on Michael West Media on April 26, 2026 titled 'BHP threatens coal miner for leaking in David v Goliath court stoush'.

Verdict: True

The claim that an article titled "BHP threatens coal miner for leaking in David v Goliath court stoush" was published on Michael West Media on April 26, 2026 is accurate and independently verifiable. The article exists on the Michael West Media website with the byline "by Michael West | Apr 26, 2026". The publication date and title are corroborated by BHP's own Federal Court filing in case NSD 752 of 2026, filed on May 6, 2026.

BHP's court filing explicitly seeks an order requiring Westpub, the publisher of Michael West Media, to permanently remove "an article published on April 26, 2026 (BHP threatens coal miner for leaking in David v Goliath court stoush)". This provides independent confirmation of both the article's existence and its publication date from a party with direct knowledge and a strong interest in accuracy regarding the content they are seeking to suppress.

The Federal Court case file itself was independently verified through the Federal Court website at comcourts.gov.au, which confirms case NSD752/2026 exists with the parties listed as "BHP GROUP LIMITED & ORS v SIMON ALEXANDER TURNER & ANOR" and a filing date of 06-May-2026. The article remains accessible on the Michael West Media website at the time of fact-checking, and the court documents reference it by its exact title and publication date. The claim is accurate in all material respects.

Sources cited:

Claim 5: Simon Turner broke his back working at the Mt Arthur coal mine in the Hunter Valley in 2015.

Verdict: Mostly True

The claim that Simon Turner broke his back working at the Mt Arthur coal mine in the Hunter Valley in 2015 is substantially accurate but requires minor technical qualification regarding the precise characterization of the injury. Multiple authoritative Tier 2 sources confirm the core facts of the claim.

The Newcastle Herald reported in June 2018 that Simon Turner "was injured when an excavator shovel hit the cabin of his truck in December 2015," and in August 2019 stated more specifically that "Mr Turner suffered work-ending spinal damage in his own dump truck accident in December 2015 when his truck was hit by by the bucket of an excavator, throwing him around the cabin." Multiple other Newcastle Herald and Muswellbrook Chronicle articles from 2018 confirm Turner "suffered a workplace injury" at the mine "in late 2015" that left him unable to work. Mining Technology reported in 2020 that Turner "suffered a spinal injury at work in 2015."

The available evidence confirms Turner sustained serious spinal damage in a workplace accident at Mt Arthur in December 2015 involving an excavator bucket striking his truck cabin. The phrase "broke his back" is a colloquial description that aligns with the documented "spinal damage" and "spinal injury" consistently reported across multiple independent news sources. While medical records would provide definitive confirmation of the specific nature of fractures or other spinal injuries, the authoritative sources consistently confirm a serious, work-ending spinal injury occurred at the specified time and location. The claim is accurate in all material respects: the person, Simon Turner, location, Mt Arthur coal mine in the Hunter Valley, timing, 2015, specifically December 2015, and nature of injury, serious spinal damage.

Claim 6: Simon Turner was being paid $400 a week when he should have been paid $137k a year.

Verdict: Unsupported

The claim that Simon Turner was being paid $400 a week when he should have been paid $137,000 a year cannot be verified from authoritative sources on the whitelist. All reporting of these specific wage figures comes exclusively from Michael West Media itself, which cannot serve as independent verification of its own claims.

The existence of broader wage issues at BHP is well documented by multiple whitelisted sources. ABC News and other authoritative outlets confirm BHP admitted to underpaying approximately 30,000 workers $430 million for incorrect leave deductions spanning 2010 to 2023. Additionally, Fair Work Commission rulings in July 2025 ordered BHP to pay approximately 2,200 Queensland coal miners an average $30,000 more annually under Same Job Same Pay legislation, with unions and industrial relations sources confirming systematic underpayment of labour hire workers in the coal mining sector.

The Federal Court case file NSD 752 of 2026 exists on the Commonwealth Courts Portal, confirming litigation between Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd and others against Simon Alexander Turner and Michael West Media's publisher. However, court documents are subject to suppression orders, and the case file itself does not verify the specific wage figures claimed.

While the Black Coal Mining Industry Award exists and sets minimum conditions for coal miners, and while whitelisted sources confirm BHP has faced multiple findings of wage underpayment through various mechanisms, no authoritative source independent of Michael West Media has reported or verified the specific claim that Turner personally was paid $400 per week instead of an entitlement of $137,000 per year. Without independent corroboration from at least one whitelisted source, this specific factual claim must be classified as unsupported, notwithstanding the documented existence of broader wage issues affecting BHP coal workers.

Sources cited:

Claim 7: Michael West Media has published at least eleven stories on Simon Turner's case.

Verdict: True

The claim that Michael West Media has published at least eleven stories on Simon Turner's case is accurate and appears to be conservative. Through comprehensive searches of Michael West Media's coverage, at least 18 distinct written articles specifically about Simon Turner's case against BHP and related parties were identified, published between July 2024 and May 2026.

These articles include content dated as far back as July 18, 2024, with "Black Hole: CFMEU, governments, BHP, black coal giants in $2.5B worker wage swindle," continuing through multiple articles in 2025 and into 2026. The most recent article at the time of this fact-check was "BHP wanted us silenced NOW. The Federal Court said no" from May 14, 2026, just days after the article being fact-checked was published.

The articles cover various aspects of Turner's case, including his initial injury at BHP's Mt Arthur coal mine in 2015, allegations of wage theft, court proceedings with suppression orders, his appeal, and ultimately BHP's lawsuit against both Turner and Michael West Media itself. Multiple video reports on The West Report channel also covered the story, including content referenced in BHP's court filings.

Michael West Media's own statement in the article being fact-checked uses the phrase "at least eleven stories," which is demonstrably true and actually understates their coverage. The publication has covered this story extensively over nearly two years, with the count easily exceeding eleven separate articles. The claim is factually accurate and verifiable through publicly accessible content on the Michael West Media website.

Claim 8: Michael West established Michael West Media in 2016.

Verdict: True

The claim that Michael West established Michael West Media in 2016 is accurate and well-supported by multiple independent sources. According to Crikey, Michael West left Fairfax Media in May 2016 after being made compulsorily redundant, with reports from Mumbrella in May 2016 confirming that West signalled his intention to launch his own investigative journalism website after the Federal election. Crikey reported in July 2016 that West launched his new website after his redundancy from the Sydney Morning Herald.

Multiple sources confirm the 2016 founding date. Michael West Media's own About page states that West "struck out on his own in July 2016," and an event listing from Humanitix confirms West "struck out on his own in July 2016." The LinkedIn page for Michael West Media also lists the company as founded in 2016.

The timeline is consistent across sources: West was made redundant from Fairfax in May 2016, and launched his independent media outlet, Michael West Media, in mid-2016, specifically July according to multiple sources. The claim in the article is therefore accurate, though it could be more precise by specifying July 2016 rather than just 2016. However, stating the year alone is not misleading or inaccurate. The claim is substantiated by independent reporting from established Australian media industry publications.

Sources cited:

Overall assessment

Of the eight factual claims examined in this article, four were found to be True, one Mostly True, one Misleading, and two Unsupported. The core claims about the Federal Court case, including the case number NSD 752 of 2026 and filing date of 6 May 2026, are directly verified by official court records. The publication dates of specific articles and the establishment of Michael West Media in 2016 are also accurately stated and independently corroborated.

The claim about Simon Turner's back injury at Mt Arthur coal mine in 2015 is substantially accurate, supported by multiple independent news reports from the Newcastle Herald, Muswellbrook Chronicle, and Mining Technology, though "broke his back" is colloquial rather than a precise medical description of the documented spinal damage. The claim about publishing at least eleven stories on Turner's case is conservative and verifiable.

However, two significant claims cannot be independently verified. The specific wage figures, $400 per week versus an entitlement of $137,000 per year, have not been reported by any authoritative source outside Michael West Media itself, despite broader documented wage underpayment issues at BHP. The details of the June 7, 2024 conciliation conference, including attendees and format, similarly lack independent corroboration. One claim about a YouTube video published on April 15, 2026 is contradicted by Michael West Media's own later reporting, which indicates the content was published April 11, 2026 as an editorial in multiple formats.

The article's central narrative, that BHP filed Federal Court action seeking to suppress journalism about Simon Turner's case, is verified. However, some supporting details lack independent confirmation, and one contains a material inaccuracy. A right of reply was offered to MW Media pursuant to ScrutinyPress editorial standards.


This fact-check reviews the article "BHP is suing us. Here is the File Number." published by Michael West Media.

Right of reply was offered to Michael West Media with a 48-hour response window. No response was received.


Correction: The overall verdict was updated from Unsupported to Misleading following community-submitted evidence.

Claims assessed


Claim 1 True
BHP has filed a Federal Court application with the case number NSD 752 of 2026, filed on 6 May 2026.

The claim that BHP filed a Federal Court application with case number NSD 752 of 2026 on 6 May 2026 is confirmed by official Federal Court records. The community-submitted evidence from the Federal Court of Australia's case management system (comcourts.gov.au) shows that case NSD752/2026 was filed on 06-May-2026 with the parties listed as BHP GROUP LIMITED & ORS v SIMON ALEXANDER TURNER & ANOR. The court record also shows that a cross-claim was filed by Turner on 14-May-2026, and the case status is listed as open. While the article describes the applicant as "Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd & Ors [BHP]" and the official court record lists "BHP GROUP LIMITED & ORS," this represents a minor variation in how the corporate applicants are named rather than a factual error. Multiple authoritative sources, including BHP's own website, NSW government resources, and industry publications, confirm that Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BHP that operates the Mt Arthur Coal mine. The notation "& Ors" (and others) indicates multiple related corporate entities are applicants, which is consistent with both characterizations. The core factual elements of the claim, the case number NSD 752 of 2026 and the filing date of 6 May 2026, are directly corroborated by the official Federal Court registry data. No evidence was found contradicting these specific factual assertions. While no independent media coverage from whitelisted sources was located to provide additional corroboration, the primary source court record itself constitutes the highest tier of evidence for verifying the existence and details of a legal filing.

Sources

Claim 2 Unsupported
A conciliation conference was held by Microsoft Teams on 7 June 2024 with parties Tom Hunter-Leahy, Lachlan Apps, Sophie Croft, Simon Turner, Trent Forno, John Hickey, and Hugh Carter.

The claim states that a conciliation conference was held by Microsoft Teams on 7 June 2024 with specific parties including Tom Hunter-Leahy, Lachlan Apps, Sophie Croft, Simon Turner, Trent Forno, John Hickey, and Hugh Carter. This claim originates from Michael West Media's own reporting about what BHP allegedly included in its Federal Court Originating Application in case NSD 752 of 2026. The Federal Court case file (NSD752/2026) is confirmed to exist, filed on 6 May 2026, with parties listed as BHP Group Limited and others versus Simon Alexander Turner and another party. Research confirms that Microsoft Teams is commonly used technology for conciliation conferences in Australian federal courts. Hugh Carter is confirmed through multiple sources as a barrister associated with Senator Malcolm Roberts and One Nation. However, the specific factual claims about the June 7, 2024 conciliation conference, including its occurrence, the precise list of attendees, and its format, cannot be independently verified from authoritative whitelisted sources. The only sources referencing these details are Michael West Media articles themselves, which report on what they claim BHP stated in court filings. No independent media reporting from whitelisted outlets (ABC, Guardian Australia, AFR, etc.) was found covering this specific conciliation conference or its attendees. While the context around the claim appears plausible (the court case exists, the technology is standard, the individuals mentioned have confirmed associations), the specific factual assertions about this particular conference on this particular date with these particular attendees cannot be corroborated from independent authoritative sources on the whitelist. The article's disclosure notes it is reporting from court files, but those court files are not directly accessible as independent verification.

Claim 3 Misleading
A YouTube video was published on Michael West Media on April 15, 2026 titled 'Pauline, Please Explain | The West Report'.

The claim states that a YouTube video titled "Pauline, Please Explain | The West Report" was published on Michael West Media on April 15, 2026. According to BHP's court filing in Federal Court case NSD 752 of 2026, BHP did seek orders to remove a YouTube video with this exact title allegedly published on April 15, 2026. However, evidence from Michael West Media's own subsequent reporting indicates this claim contains a critical inaccuracy regarding the publication date and format. In Michael West Media's article "BHP wanted us silenced NOW. The Federal Court said no" published on May 21, 2026, the publication states that BHP's original application filed on May 6, 2026 "was directed at our earlier coverage of these events, in particular the editorial we published on April 11, 2026 under the title Please Explain, Pauline, which we also released in print and in podcast form." This indicates the content titled "Please Explain, Pauline" (note the different word order from the claim) was published on April 11, 2026, not April 15, 2026, and was released as an editorial in multiple formats including print and podcast, not specifically as a YouTube video on that date. The confusion appears to stem from BHP's court documents, which reference a video titled "Pauline, Please Explain | The West Report" with an April 15, 2026 date. However, Michael West Media's own contemporaneous reporting clarifies the actual publication was an editorial titled "Please Explain, Pauline" on April 11, 2026. The discrepancy in dates (April 11 vs April 15) and the reversed title order, combined with Michael West Media describing it as an editorial released in multiple formats rather than a YouTube video specifically, indicates the claim as stated contains material inaccuracies that could mislead readers about when and how this content was published.

Claim 4 True
An article was published on Michael West Media on April 26, 2026 titled 'BHP threatens coal miner for leaking in David v Goliath court stoush'.

The claim that an article titled 'BHP threatens coal miner for leaking in David v Goliath court stoush' was published on Michael West Media on April 26, 2026 is accurate. The article exists on the Michael West Media website with the byline "by Michael West | Apr 26, 2026". The publication date and title are corroborated by BHP's own Federal Court filing in case NSD 752 of 2026, filed on May 6, 2026, which explicitly seeks an order requiring Westpub (the publisher of Michael West Media) to permanently remove "an article published on April 26, 2026 (BHP threatens coal miner for leaking in David v Goliath court stoush)". The Federal Court case file itself was independently verified through the community-submitted evidence from the Federal Court website (comcourts.gov.au), which confirms case NSD752/2026 exists with the parties listed as "BHP GROUP LIMITED & ORS v SIMON ALEXANDER TURNER & ANOR" and a filing date of 06-May-2026. The article remains accessible on the Michael West Media website at the time of fact-checking, and the court documents reference it by its exact title and publication date, providing independent confirmation of both the article's existence and its April 26, 2026 publication date.

Sources

Claim 5 Mostly True
Simon Turner broke his back working at the Mt Arthur coal mine in the Hunter Valley in 2015.

The claim that Simon Turner broke his back working at the Mt Arthur coal mine in the Hunter Valley in 2015 is substantially accurate but requires minor technical qualification regarding the precise characterization of the injury. Multiple authoritative Tier 2 sources confirm the core facts. The Newcastle Herald reported in June 2018 that Simon Turner "was injured when an excavator shovel hit the cabin of his truck in December 2015," and in August 2019 stated more specifically that "Mr Turner suffered work-ending spinal damage in his own dump truck accident in December 2015 when his truck was hit by by the bucket of an excavator, throwing him around the cabin." Multiple other Newcastle Herald and Muswellbrook Chronicle articles from 2018 confirm Turner "suffered a workplace injury" at the mine "in late 2015" that left him unable to work. Mining Technology reported in 2020 that Turner "suffered a spinal injury at work in 2015." Michael West Media's own reporting consistently describes Turner as having "broke his back at BHP's Mt Arthur mine in 2015," language that appears in multiple articles. This characterization is also used by unhappyminers.com.au, a campaign website covering the case. The available evidence confirms Turner sustained serious spinal damage in a workplace accident at Mt Arthur in December 2015 involving an excavator bucket striking his truck cabin. The phrase "broke his back" is a colloquial description that aligns with the documented "spinal damage" and "spinal injury." While medical records would provide definitive confirmation of the specific nature of fractures or other spinal injuries, the authoritative sources consistently confirm a serious, work-ending spinal injury occurred at the specified time and location. The claim is accurate in all material respects: the person (Simon Turner), location (Mt Arthur coal mine, Hunter Valley), timing (2015, specifically December 2015), and nature of injury (serious spinal damage). The only minor qualification is that "broke his back" is a colloquial term rather than a precise medical description, though it accurately conveys the severity of the documented spinal injury.

Claim 6 Unsupported
Simon Turner was being paid $400 a week when he should have been paid $137k a year.

The claim that Simon Turner was being paid $400 a week when he should have been paid $137,000 a year cannot be verified from authoritative sources on the whitelist. All reporting of these specific wage figures comes exclusively from Michael West Media itself, which cannot serve as independent verification of its own claims. The existence of broader wage issues at BHP is well documented. ABC News and other whitelisted sources confirm BHP admitted to underpaying approximately 30,000 workers $430 million for incorrect leave deductions spanning 2010 to 2023. Additionally, Fair Work Commission rulings in July 2025 ordered BHP to pay approximately 2,200 Queensland coal miners an average $30,000 more annually under Same Job Same Pay legislation, with unions and industrial relations sources confirming systematic underpayment of labour hire workers in the coal mining sector. The Federal Court case file NSD 752 of 2026 exists on the Commonwealth Courts Portal, confirming litigation between Hunter Valley Energy Coal Pty Ltd and others against Simon Alexander Turner and Michael West Media's publisher. However, court documents are subject to suppression orders, and the case file itself does not verify the specific wage figures claimed. While the Black Coal Mining Industry Award exists and sets minimum conditions for coal miners, and while whitelisted sources confirm BHP has faced multiple findings of wage underpayment through various mechanisms, no authoritative source independent of Michael West Media has reported or verified the specific claim that Turner personally was paid $400 per week instead of an entitlement of $137,000 per year. Without independent corroboration from at least one whitelisted source, this specific factual claim must be classified as unsupported, notwithstanding the documented existence of broader wage issues affecting BHP coal workers.

Sources

Claim 7 True
Michael West Media has published at least eleven stories on Simon Turner's case.

The claim that Michael West Media has published at least eleven stories on Simon Turner's case is accurate and appears to be conservative. Through comprehensive searches of Michael West Media's coverage, I was able to identify at least 18 distinct written articles specifically about Simon Turner's case against BHP and related parties, published between July 2024 and May 2026. These include articles dated as far back as July 18, 2024 ("Black Hole: CFMEU, governments, BHP, black coal giants in $2.5B worker wage swindle"), continuing through multiple articles in 2025 and into 2026, with the most recent being "BHP wanted us silenced NOW. The Federal Court said no" from May 14, 2026, just days after the article being fact-checked. The articles cover various aspects of Turner's case, including his initial injury at BHP's Mt Arthur coal mine in 2015, allegations of wage theft, court proceedings with suppression orders, his appeal, and ultimately BHP's lawsuit against both Turner and Michael West Media itself. Multiple video reports on The West Report channel also covered the story, including "Pauline, Please Explain" (April 15, 2026) and "We are Getting Sued by BHP" (recent). Michael West Media's own statement in the article being fact-checked uses the phrase "at least eleven stories," which is demonstrably true and actually understates their coverage. The publication has covered this story extensively over nearly two years, with the count easily exceeding eleven separate articles. The claim is factually accurate and verifiable through publicly accessible content on the Michael West Media website.

Claim 8 True
Michael West established Michael West Media in 2016.

The claim that Michael West established Michael West Media in 2016 is accurate and well-supported by multiple independent sources. <cite index="21-3,21-8">According to Crikey, Michael West left Fairfax Media in May 2016 after being made compulsorily redundant</cite>, with <cite index="23-2,23-8">reports from Mumbrella in May 2016 confirming that West signalled his intention to launch his own investigative journalism website after the Federal election</cite>. <cite index="25-4">Crikey reported in July 2016 that West launched his new website</cite> after his redundancy from the Sydney Morning Herald. Multiple sources confirm the 2016 founding date. <cite index="12-12,12-15">Michael West Media's own About page states that West "struck out on his own in July 2016"</cite>, and <cite index="16-1,16-7">an event listing from Humanitix confirms West "struck out on his own in July 2016"</cite>. The LinkedIn page for Michael West Media also lists the company as founded in 2016. The timeline is consistent across sources: West was made redundant from Fairfax in May 2016, and launched his independent media outlet, Michael West Media, in mid-2016 (specifically July according to multiple sources). The claim in the article is therefore accurate, though it could be more precise by specifying July 2016 rather than just 2016. However, stating the year alone is not misleading or inaccurate.

Contribute evidence or feedback

Have a source that supports or challenges this verdict? Submit it for editorial review. Approved links and documents may be used to update this fact-check.

0 / 2000

All submissions are reviewed by editors before being made public. Submitting false or defamatory material may constitute a legal offence.